WebApr 18, 2024 · The classical civil disobedience debate. 3 The "classical" understanding of civil disobedience stated most influentially by John Rawls was developed in response to a historically specific paradigm of political activism in the 1960s and 70s at a time of the US civil rights movement, anti-Vietnam war protests and widespread student protests ... WebFeb 6, 2024 · John Rawls is a central figure in contemporary philosophical and theoretical discussions of civil disobedience, which hope to contribute to significant political debates around when and in which forms political dissent, protest and resistance are appropriate.
Civil Disobedience (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter …
WebMar 7, 2024 · Hannah Arendt, in her theoretical responses to the same wave of protest that occupied Rawls, pursues a somewhat different path. Footnote 6 The resistance of the civil rights and student movements, for her, is a manifestation of the “revolutionary spirit”—a heightened care for the public realm that drives us to act within it and for it—that … WebJustice, 'the most influential of the government' Rawls clearly operates within contemporary philosophical a Socratic tradition that accepts the discussion on civil disobedience' existing system as the framework (p. 4), a text which has, through its hegemonic position, within which civil disobedience takes place. diabetes nhs type 1
【现货】A Theory of Justice 正义论 John Rawls 约翰· ... - 淘宝
WebNov 16, 2024 · Rawls's theory of civil disobedience is firmly embedded in his overall theory of justice, and he discusses civil disobedience only as an issue in near-just societies – which for Rawls means ... WebThis chapter calls upon history to show how the standard, broadly Rawlsian conception of civil disobedience (though not necessarily Rawls’s own) rests on an unrealistic and objectionable reading of the African American civil rights struggle. It also argues that the official reading of the civil rights movement functions as a counter ... Webretaliate against civil disobedience” (in Olson 2013, 363).1 However, the actions of Swartz and Anonymous 16 sit uneasily within the conceptual framework of civil disobe-dience. We tend to think of civil disobedience as “an illegal, public, nonviolent, conscientiously motivated act of protest, done by someone who accepts the legitimacy of ... cindy cordle