Web16 May 2013 · Section 213 orders serve a different purpose from the penalties that can be imposed by a criminal court or the MMT: while the latter are imposed in the public interest of punishing prohibited acts, the former are remedial in nature and are in the collective interests of persons dealing in the market who have been injured by market misconduct. Web24 May 2024 · civil or criminal liability for disclosure of false or misleading information inducing transactions under section 277 or 298 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) (plus potential liability in connection with remedial or other orders under section 213 SFO proceedings); or;
APAC Monthly Private Wealth Legal Developments – June 2024
WebOrdinance (SFO) – paving the way for the SFC to pursue compensatory claims on behalf of investors. (See our previous client briefings for more information on the background of … WebTo print the whole chapter in HTML, please click at the bottom of the TOC panel and then click .Please set the page orientation to “Landscape” for printing of bilingual texts on a … manthyrose
Court of Appeal upheld SFC’s appeal in Tiger Asia, confirming …
WebActing for a Korean company in section 213 SFO proceedings brought by the SFC in relation to allegations of insider dealing. The case was stuck out. Advising a leading multinational … Web25 Apr 2024 · The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has been proactive in utilising section 213 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) (SFO) to bring legal … Web21 Feb 2024 · Pursuant to section 213 of the SFO, the SFC sought various reliefs against the Eastmore Defendants, including a restoration order (i.e. to restore the market participants … mantic asterians